Apple iWatch and the enigma

Since the sixth generation iPod Nano, many people thought that Apple makes its own brand watch is not only a smart potential, but simply a matter of time. Regardless of what some have recently argued, I doubt, however, that Apple is now hungry enough to create the device iWatch legendary.

I covered the technology beat long enough to feel, not feel some changes in the market gadget. I speak of these cycles when a new product category and sources of nowhere at first seems like a completely crazy notion. Shortly after the segment really heats dozens of companies jumping into the fray to make a quick buck.Traditionally if Apple feel a legitimate opportunity, at this moment it occurs just after appearing on the secret of success and sucks air on the right market. MP3 players and tablets existed before Apple launched the iPod and iPad, but their arrival has completely transformed the field. Remember music players from Creative Labs, Rio, or even clumsy Microsoft Windows Tablet PC?

I get the same tingling sensation in smartwatches time. At CES in January, the surprise hit of the show was wearable technology, essentially devices that you can strap or clip it to yourself as you would an accessory or clothing. Smartwatches many bands of fitness, or some combination of both, were discussed at the conference.

These include everything from Pebble overdue and funded by the crowd and Dick Watch Tracy/007-inspired Passport Martian Fitbit tracker for Flex Fitness and baseband. When you factor in the success of the Nike FuelBand, Nike is a company Apple has partnered with the past to create fitness products, I would say it is time for Apple to join the kill.This is an initiative of the Cupertino company used to do without breaking a sweat. Apple has a knack of catching competition completely caught off guard, surprising given that many had already ahead. The iPhone is a perfect example. Smartphones existed for years, but the iPhone has sounded the death knell for Microsoft Windows Mobile products struggle - believe me, I've been struggling with a wing T-Mobile at the time. Sidekick and a legion of feature phones on keyboard suffered the same fate.

I fear that Apple has not shown his signature ferocity in recent years. We have not seen a truly disruptive product of the company since the first iPad. Each version of the remarkable material has since been evolutionary and incremental, not transformation. Mini iPad is just a small iPad, while the iPhone 5 screen essentially increased from 3.7 to 4 inches. Its processor A6 is also dual-core processors Android where many have gone full quad-core and 4G LTE received well after its rivals.

What Apple needs here is true out-of-the-box action to quell the skeptics in general and Wall Street. A serious example of non-linear thinking which corresponds to the creation of the iPod, iPhone and iPad. Something that could merge multiple applications and gadgets into something completely new or maybe clean up the mess confuse other manufacturers tout as useful gadgets. Something like a fabulous Apple iWatch brilliant.